Anthropology article review
As seen in this article, thirteen children were stabbed by Zheng Minsheng a 42 year old man in China on the 23rd of March 2012. These children were waiting at their primary school gate. Out of the thirteen children, eight of them lost their lives. Consequently, in a range of time, five other killings that took place in schools happened in various parts of China. Between March 23 and May 2010, many children were injured and killed. All of these killings were conducted by men in their middle ages. They were using cleavers, knives or hammers. As seen in this article, many children were the main victims of the secluded cases of spree killings in China.
Even though China experienced spree killings, school killings did not occur at a higher range within a short time range. These attacks were happening in different provinces. Probably, the first attack that occurred led to the other attacks. Different societies in China also experience these attacks. Even though China had a lot of school children killings, these killings in schools mainly took place in North America and Europe. Basically, they were brought by individualization, mass media effects and social breakdowns. Explaining the killings happening in Chinese schools may be difficult to assert it with the changing Chinese culture. These killings may be connected with the social changes that have taken place in the Chinese society (Forney, 2004).
Many differences arise in the killings taking place in the Western countries and China. The age of these people carrying out the killings and the weapons being used may be the differences. The perpetrators in China were older than the perpetrators in the Western countries. These killings show how China has a lot of political and social problems. Various journalists and scholars who have written articles on these killings relate the issue to insecurity, inequality, unemployment and social changes. Many of these scholars view these killings as moral crisis signs that surround China (Forney, 2004).
The killings that took place in Ruzhou are seen as rites of passage suffered by the modern societies worldwide. Ruzhou became the sixth in the deadly attacks that occurred consecutively on the schoolchildren in China that started in August (Forney, 2004). This was the time when a schizophrenic janitor at a kindergarten in Beijing stabbed fourteen children killing one of them. Later on, in Shandong province, a bus driver was executed because he had slashed twenty four children in September. Later on, in Hunan province, a teacher was arrested because he had killed four students and wounded twelve others. Yearly, the rate of rapes and murders committed by Chinese juveniles has risen to 10% per year. Stunned authorities and parents are trying to search for the reasons for this upwelling.
Other people put blames on the declination in authoritarian control and greater freedom individuals have. According to others, epochal social changes and moral ballast loss are other reasons leading to the killings. Various criminologists view that these killings were brought by media expansion that has taken place rapidly due to technological growth. The law enforcers in China view the links between the violent messages in movies and newspapers and the children killings as a media problem. In Chengdu, a western city in China, an eighteen year old improved the murder skills continuously by watching a cop show by the name “China’s No. 1 Criminal Cases” rated highly in China (Forney, 2004).
The person learned how to carry the clothing fibers and destroying the murder weapons used. In this city, a bunch of criminals in the age of fourteen years copied the Hong Kong gangster film series. They robbed people after urinating on the heads of these individuals and eventually burn the people with cigarette butts (Forney, 2004). According to this article, the police are supposed to accept some of these blames. The ministry of public security is the one that manages production studios that are creating China’s most reality police shows that are popular. Other parents in China have taken this matter in their own hands by issuing body guards to their schoolchildren (Forney, 2004).
After these massive school killings, the society nation as a wilderness was invoked frequently. By targeting the children, these perpetrators ruined the hope of the families of the children and the country. Mostly, the children killed were full of expectations from the Chinese country and their own families. By the children becoming powerful symbols between society, family and nation’s connection, it led to them becoming targets of the killings. Despite the state being blamed for these killings, it is viewed as an ironic product for the nation to promote a model of moral harmony and unity of society and state (Forney, 2004).
According to this article, I can not argue that the present Chinese society is a wilderness. On the other hand, there are no arguments that the government of China bears responsibilities of the murders that took place. Even though these ideas were noticeable in the various reactions to the killings, the government should not be blamed at large. Many Chinese people think that society is a hostile wilderness. These killings that took place in the schools have preserved in public discourse a sense of political and social alienation that is generalized. Society has being used in symbolizing this alienation. Even thought the article shows how China has had a rapid growth economically, the sense of inequality and injustice has risen considerably. The people of China need to know and understand society as one of the ways occupying space between a family and the state. This is whereby people come together.